After Alexander: Diogenes, the Cynics, and a City With No Walls
What happens to an ethics built on belonging to a city once that city stops being able to protect anyone? This episode opens the Hellenistic arc of Notions of Progress by tracing how Philip and Alexander's conquests brought organized Greek political independence to an end, and how philosophy responded once the polis could no longer guarantee anyone's flourishing. At the center of that response is Diogenes of Sinope, a philosopher who lived in a discarded wine jar, told Alexander the Great to step out of his sunlight, and built an entire idea of progress on needing nothing from the city at all. Historian F. W. Walbank's account of the shift toward personal, unaccountable Macedonian rule sets the political stage; classicists John Moles, A. A. Long, and R. Bracht Branham then help unpack what Diogenes and the Cynics actually stood for — not mere rejection, but a substantive alternative: kosmopolitēs, citizenship of the cosmos. The episode closes by tracing that idea forward, through Crates of Thebes, to a young Zeno of Citium, the future founder of the Stoics.
Show Notes & Timestamps
- Introduction — 0:34
- The Collapse of the Polis — 1:10
- Alexander's Conquest — 3:05
- Philosophical Responses — 5:31
- Diogenes and the Cynics — 6:21
- Cynic Philosophy and Cosmopolitanism — 10:45
- Aristotle vs. Diogenes — 17:26
- Looking Ahead — 18:16
Key Concepts & Terms
Kosmopolitēs (koz-moh-poh-lee-TAYS)
"Citizen of the cosmos." Diogenes' term for himself — read by classicist John Moles as a substantive alternative to civic belonging, not just a denial of it: citizenship relocated from one city to the whole of humanity.
Autarkeia (ow-tar-KAY-uh)
Self-sufficiency. Classicist A. A. Long traces the Cynic case for autarkeia to deliberate training — the same discipline that lets an athlete or a flutist earn a skill.
Parrhēsia (par-hay-SEE-uh)
Freedom to speak the truth to anyone, regardless of rank. R. Bracht Branham identifies this as the virtue behind both Diogenes' confrontation with Plato and his confrontation with Alexander.
Physis / Nomos (FOO-sis / NOH-mos)
Nature versus convention. Diogenes' governing distinction: natural functions, he argued, are proper and should be done openly, without shame — the way a dog does them, the origin of the term "Cynic" (kynikos, "dog-like").
Fascinating Historical Insights
"Here Is Plato's Man"
When Plato reportedly defined the human being as a "featherless biped," Diogenes is said to have plucked a chicken, carried it into Plato's lecture, and announced, "Here is Plato's man."
"Step Out of My Light"
When Alexander the Great offered Diogenes anything he wanted, Diogenes is reported to have asked only that Alexander step out of his sunlight. Alexander reportedly walked away remarking, "Had I not been Alexander, I would have liked to have been Diogenes."
A Goal Assigned After Death
Ancient critics faulted the Cynics for having no stated telos, or ultimate goal. According to classicists Branham and Goulet-Cazé, it was a later Stoic, Apollodorus, who retroactively assigned the Cynics one — "living in accordance with virtue" — decades after Diogenes had already died.
"Written on the Dog's Tail"
Historian Peter Green reports that Zeno of Citium's Republic was so thoroughly shaped by Cynic thinking that it was joked to have been "written on the dog's tail" — a direct reference to Diogenes, whose nickname was "the Dog."
Resources & Further Reading
Primary Sources
- Diogenes Laertius, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, Loeb Classical Library Vol. II, trans. R. D. Hicks
Works Discussed
- F. W. Walbank, The Hellenistic World
- Peter Green, Alexander to Actium: The Historical Evolution of the Hellenistic Age
- A. A. Long, essays on Diogenes and Cynic self-sufficiency (autarkeia)
- R. Bracht Branham and Marie-Odile Goulet-Cazé (eds.), The Cynics: The Cynic Movement in Antiquity and Its Legacy
- John Moles, on Cynic cosmopolitanism and kosmopolitēs
Further Context
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, entry on Cynicism
⚑ Green, Walbank, and Branham & Goulet-Cazé remain ⚑ VERIFY in your reading-list tracking, though the recorded transcript quotes all three directly — resolve formally before FINAL, per the Ferrari Rule.
Related Episodes
- Ep. 14: Aristotle Pt. 1 — the account of flourishing and the polis that this episode's Cynic argument directly answers. https://youtu.be/Q7jAurvRX9M
- Ep. 15: Aristotle Pt. 2 — five contemporary perspectives on Aristotle, immediately preceding this episode's turn to his student's conquest and its aftermath.
⚑ E15's YouTube URL isn't yet recorded in this project's memory — supply it if you'd like it linked here rather than titled only.
Coming Up Next
Notions of Progress turns to "The Machine Breakers," a conversation with Prof. Gavin Mueller of the University of Amsterdam, author of Breaking Things at Work. The interview traces Luddism as a coherent political stance against capital's use of technology to deskill and control workers — and asks whether the Luddites' claim to collective progress holds up against the philosophical questions this arc has been tracing since Aristotle.
Listen & Subscribe
Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/notions-of-progress/id1837506445
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/5WgTlVMBfFzrIQwqkqhiD9
YouTube: https://youtu.be/97G7QI7ZeOg
Website: https://www.notionsofprogress.com
Substack: https://notionsofprogress.substack.com
Instagram: @notionsofprogress
✉️ Email: marshall@notionsofprogress.com
About the Show
Notions of Progress is a podcast tracing how the idea of progress has been understood, contested, and reimagined from antiquity to the age of artificial intelligence. Marshall Madow, an independent researcher and the show's host and scholar-curator, holds an MA in History from Cambridge University, where his thesis examined Georges Sorel's epistemology of myth and the role of ideas in animating collective action, and an MSc from Oxford University's Saïd Business School, specializing in Complexity Science and Leadership. Rather than prescribing a position, the podcast surfaces scholarly debate — examining how thinkers from Hesiod to Hayek, from Plato to contemporary philosophers of technology, have understood what it means for humanity to move forward, at what cost, for whom, and by whose definition.
Email: marshall@notionsofprogress.com Website: notionsofprogress.com
Transcript
For full transcript visit: https://www.notionsofprogress.com
00:34 - Introduction
01:10 - The Collapse of the Polis
03:05 - Alexander's Conquest
05:31 - Philosophical Responses
06:21 - Diogenes and the Cynics
10:45 - Cynic Philosophy and Cosmopolitanism
17:26 - Aristotle vs. Diogenes
18:16 - Looking Ahead
00:00:00,148 --> 00:00:03,998
Aristotle built an entire ethics on a
citizen fulfilling his nature inside the
2
00:00:03,998 --> 00:00:09,277
city, whereas Diogenes built one on a life
that had no use for the city whatsoever.
3
00:00:09,568 --> 00:00:13,527
Both were answers to the same
question: What does progress toward
4
00:00:13,527 --> 00:00:15,498
a good life actually require?
5
00:00:15,708 --> 00:00:18,847
And neither man would have
recognized the other answer as
6
00:00:18,857 --> 00:00:21,078
an answer to progress at all
7
00:00:34,779 --> 00:00:38,749
Hi, welcome to Notions of Progress,
the show that traces ideas of progress
8
00:00:38,759 --> 00:00:40,599
from antiquity to the age of AI.
9
00:00:40,759 --> 00:00:44,799
Over the last two episodes, five
thinkers used Aristotle to ask what a
10
00:00:44,799 --> 00:00:46,679
human being needs in order to live well.
11
00:00:47,169 --> 00:00:51,309
And most of them, following Aristotle
himself, assumed that the answer runs
12
00:00:51,309 --> 00:00:55,489
through the polis, the Greek city-state,
the political community a citizen
13
00:00:55,489 --> 00:01:00,787
belonged to, voted in, and depended
on for a meaningful life This episode
14
00:01:00,787 --> 00:01:05,097
opens up a new arc, the Hellenistic
period, the term historians use for
15
00:01:05,107 --> 00:01:08,327
the roughly two and a half centuries
stretching from Alexander the Great's
16
00:01:08,367 --> 00:01:10,307
conquest to the, our rise of Rome.
17
00:01:10,387 --> 00:01:15,437
So this episode begins where the last arc
left off, with Aristotle's own assumption,
18
00:01:15,847 --> 00:01:17,837
and that asks what happened to it?
19
00:01:17,927 --> 00:01:21,837
This episode covers Alexander's reign
and what it did to the polis that
20
00:01:21,847 --> 00:01:26,747
Aristotle had taken for granted, the
range of philosophical movements that
21
00:01:26,747 --> 00:01:31,757
emerged in the years afterward, and one
of the movements in depth, the Cynics.
22
00:01:32,517 --> 00:01:36,747
We'll look at their founder, Diogenes
of Sinope, who was a genuinely colorful
23
00:01:36,747 --> 00:01:41,027
character whose philosophy amounted to
its own answer to the idea of progress.
24
00:01:41,127 --> 00:01:45,287
So while this episode does not argue that
the reign of Alexander brought about one
25
00:01:45,287 --> 00:01:49,927
school of philosophy or another, it does
seek to surface the individuals and the
26
00:01:49,927 --> 00:01:51,877
movements that emerged in this aftermath.
27
00:01:52,697 --> 00:01:56,377
So as we discussed in previous
episodes, Aristotelian ideas of
28
00:01:56,377 --> 00:02:00,247
flourishing, eudaimonia, were built
around the notion of the citizen
29
00:02:00,367 --> 00:02:02,487
and the polis working together.
30
00:02:03,466 --> 00:02:06,717
So what follows is a documented
transformation in what the polis
31
00:02:06,727 --> 00:02:10,607
could still offer its citizens
and a range of thinkers, Aristotle
32
00:02:10,607 --> 00:02:14,137
among them, who each engaged that
transformation in their own way.
33
00:02:15,407 --> 00:02:19,097
What a good life actually requires
and what happens when the thing it
34
00:02:19,097 --> 00:02:23,307
was built on stops being reliable
is not a question that remained.
35
00:02:23,377 --> 00:02:27,317
So Aristotle's entire theory of
human flourishing depended on one
36
00:02:27,317 --> 00:02:28,897
institution more than any other.
37
00:02:29,286 --> 00:02:34,386
He argued that a human being is by nature
a political animal, and that a flourishing
38
00:02:34,386 --> 00:02:40,346
life was barely intelligible outside the
polis, outside the city state, where a
39
00:02:40,346 --> 00:02:42,677
Greek citizen voted in and depended on.
40
00:02:42,767 --> 00:02:45,696
So ethics for Aristotle was not
something that worked out alone.
41
00:02:45,856 --> 00:02:50,466
It was something that was practiced
inside of a political community with
42
00:02:50,496 --> 00:02:53,086
other citizens over one's lifetime.
43
00:02:53,176 --> 00:02:56,196
That interrelationship between
flourishing and community is the
44
00:02:56,197 --> 00:02:58,027
hinge that this episode turns on.
45
00:02:58,687 --> 00:03:02,437
It begins with one of Aristotle's
own students and a very well-known
46
00:03:02,437 --> 00:03:04,626
figure, Alexander the Great.
47
00:03:05,657 --> 00:03:09,026
Now, Aristotle's student went on
to conquer the known world, and
48
00:03:09,026 --> 00:03:13,067
in doing so, he ended the kind of
political independence the polis at
49
00:03:13,067 --> 00:03:14,807
its best had offered its citizens.
50
00:03:15,976 --> 00:03:21,116
Alexander's father, Philip, had spent two
decades unifying Macedon and extending
51
00:03:21,116 --> 00:03:23,977
its power south into Greece before that.
52
00:03:24,037 --> 00:03:28,746
So at the Battle of Chaeronea,
Philip's army defeated a coalition of
53
00:03:28,746 --> 00:03:34,146
Greek city-states, including Athens,
Thebes, and thereby ending organized
54
00:03:34,157 --> 00:03:36,226
Greek military resistance for good.
55
00:03:37,489 --> 00:03:42,679
So Ar- Alexander inherited both the army
and the ambition set out on the campaign
56
00:03:42,679 --> 00:03:47,929
of conquest that carried Macedonian rule
from Greece to Egypt to the edge of India.
57
00:03:47,989 --> 00:03:52,099
Historian F.W. Walbank documents
what this did to the character
58
00:03:52,119 --> 00:03:53,449
of Greek political life.
59
00:03:53,449 --> 00:03:56,319
So this is really important because
this, this historian makes the claim
60
00:03:56,319 --> 00:04:00,389
that this had a major shift in how Greeks
perceived themselves within the political
61
00:04:00,469 --> 00:04:02,129
arena, the s- the political sphere.
62
00:04:02,269 --> 00:04:08,069
Alexander himself, Walbank writes, quote,
"Had grown increasingly authoritarian,"
63
00:04:08,369 --> 00:04:14,009
and his empire, quote, "Retained only
the faintest links with the Macedonian
64
00:04:14,009 --> 00:04:18,089
monarchy that had once grown with at
least some accountability to its own
65
00:04:18,089 --> 00:04:22,549
nobility." So kingship under Alexander
became personal rather than national.
66
00:04:22,829 --> 00:04:27,029
Loyalty to one man, not to
any inherited political order.
67
00:04:28,199 --> 00:04:31,409
This integration continued
after Alexander was gone.
68
00:04:31,458 --> 00:04:36,249
He died in three twenty three B.C.
with no clear successor, and his former
69
00:04:36,249 --> 00:04:39,769
generals spent the next twenty-five
years fighting each other for control
70
00:04:39,769 --> 00:04:45,111
of what Alexander had built Wallbank
documents their methods directly.
71
00:04:45,891 --> 00:04:49,891
They repeatedly proclaimed Greek
freedom as a public slogan while
72
00:04:49,891 --> 00:04:52,781
actually controlling the cities
through military garrisons.
73
00:04:53,371 --> 00:04:57,441
So it was kind of like a two-tiered
system here, freedom and autonomy
74
00:04:57,471 --> 00:05:01,251
that in Wallbank's own words did
not provide control over Greece
75
00:05:01,281 --> 00:05:03,581
and usually remained mere words.
76
00:05:03,831 --> 00:05:05,071
So this was very performative.
77
00:05:05,901 --> 00:05:09,481
The polis that Aristotle had assumed
would anchor his citizens' ethical
78
00:05:09,481 --> 00:05:14,331
life now existed in some- someone
else's empire far away, and it was also
79
00:05:14,331 --> 00:05:18,710
defended by someone else's soldiers
with the use of mercenaries, and it
80
00:05:18,711 --> 00:05:21,051
promised a freedom that rarely arrived.
81
00:05:21,831 --> 00:05:25,391
Whatever the polis had been for
Aristotle, it was something completely
82
00:05:25,391 --> 00:05:29,321
different now following Alexander,
and different people responded to that
83
00:05:29,321 --> 00:05:31,631
difference in very different ways.
84
00:05:31,711 --> 00:05:34,990
Disintegration of the polis
did not produce one monolithic
85
00:05:35,020 --> 00:05:36,371
philosophical response.
86
00:05:36,801 --> 00:05:37,931
No, not at all.
87
00:05:38,401 --> 00:05:41,981
It produced several, and what
follows is a quick survey of the
88
00:05:41,981 --> 00:05:44,991
field before this episode narrows
in one figure in particular.
89
00:05:44,991 --> 00:05:50,320
Zeno of Citium, who arrived in Athens
not long after Alexander's death,
90
00:05:50,391 --> 00:05:55,861
eventually founded the Stoics, a school
built on the idea that virtue alone is
91
00:05:55,861 --> 00:06:00,810
sufficient for a good life, regardless of
outcome and regardless of circumstance.
92
00:06:01,381 --> 00:06:06,941
Another, Epicurus, a near exact
contemporary, he founded a completely
93
00:06:06,941 --> 00:06:10,741
different school that was built around
friendship, modest pleasure, and
94
00:06:10,751 --> 00:06:12,721
deliberate withdrawal from public life.
95
00:06:12,881 --> 00:06:16,030
These were two different responses
in the post-Alexander world.
96
00:06:16,111 --> 00:06:18,630
Both schools get their own
episodes, and we're gonna
97
00:06:18,631 --> 00:06:20,301
discuss them later in this arc.
98
00:06:21,241 --> 00:06:25,901
This episode goes on to the response that
came first, chronologically as well as
99
00:06:25,901 --> 00:06:30,821
philosophically, the Cynics, founded by a
man who answered the disintegration of the
100
00:06:30,821 --> 00:06:36,791
polis by rejecting the idea that anyone
needed a polis at all, and that figure was
101
00:06:36,900 --> 00:06:39,921
Diogenes, a genuinely colorful character.
102
00:06:41,001 --> 00:06:45,220
His reputation for biting wit was,
according to the sources, entirely
103
00:06:45,230 --> 00:06:48,701
earned, and whose personality
did as much to found the Cynic
104
00:06:48,711 --> 00:06:50,700
movement as any doctrine he wrote.
105
00:06:51,801 --> 00:06:57,180
Diogenes earned the nickname The Dog,
Kynikos in Greek, the origin of Cynic.
106
00:06:57,490 --> 00:07:00,441
So that's where the word comes
from, because he lived by one
107
00:07:00,441 --> 00:07:04,340
distinction, nature against
convention, physis against nomos.
108
00:07:05,220 --> 00:07:09,160
What that translates to is natural
functions, he argued, were proper
109
00:07:09,161 --> 00:07:13,161
and should be done openly, without
shame, the way a dog does them.
110
00:07:14,705 --> 00:07:19,275
So he appeared very crude to the folks
during that time, and he looked the part.
111
00:07:19,835 --> 00:07:24,355
Diogenes lived in a discarded wine
jar, as legends, as legend tells it.
112
00:07:24,435 --> 00:07:28,755
He walked barefoot in the snow, and he
got on by whatever a beggar's cloak, a
113
00:07:28,755 --> 00:07:30,975
walking stick, and a knapsack can carry.
114
00:07:32,305 --> 00:07:34,775
And some Plato, according
to classicist A.A.
115
00:07:34,775 --> 00:07:39,475
Long, is reported to have summed him
up in three words: "Socrates gone
116
00:07:39,485 --> 00:07:44,375
mad." He described that life as a
kind of training, not deprivation.
117
00:07:45,035 --> 00:07:50,175
Diogenes held, according to Professor
Long, that human excellence takes both
118
00:07:50,195 --> 00:07:55,485
mental and physical exercise, the same
continuous practice that lets flutists
119
00:07:55,505 --> 00:07:57,805
and athletes excel in their own fields.
120
00:07:58,815 --> 00:08:02,345
Diogenes is preaching the virtue
of a lived life, a practiced life.
121
00:08:02,405 --> 00:08:06,605
His own words, preserved by Diogenes,
"Training can prevail over anything."
122
00:08:06,865 --> 00:08:11,194
Quote, "The actual despising of pleasure
is thoroughly pleasurable when it has
123
00:08:11,195 --> 00:08:16,265
become habitual." So Diogenes, in part,
spoke about self-denial and discipline.
124
00:08:16,744 --> 00:08:21,245
He treated the discipline of wanting
nothing as its own kind of contest,
125
00:08:21,555 --> 00:08:23,205
where he clearly meant to win.
126
00:08:23,285 --> 00:08:28,345
His wit shows up just as clearly in two
confrontations, as was noted by classicist
127
00:08:28,394 --> 00:08:32,544
R. Bracht Branham, identifies as the
defining moments of his public life.
128
00:08:33,065 --> 00:08:36,594
In the first one, against Plato,
philosophy's highest authority at the
129
00:08:36,595 --> 00:08:41,475
time, and one against Alexander the Great,
the world's greatest political authority.
130
00:08:42,175 --> 00:08:47,645
So when Plato defined the human being
as a featherless biped, Diogenes is said
131
00:08:47,645 --> 00:08:51,985
to have plucked a chicken, walked into
Plato's lecture, and announced, "Here
132
00:08:51,985 --> 00:08:57,225
is Plato's man." When Alexander found
Diogenes at Cor- Corinth and offered him
133
00:08:57,275 --> 00:09:01,525
anything he wanted, Diogenes asked him
to just please step out of the light.
134
00:09:02,135 --> 00:09:05,285
Reportedly the only thing he wanted
from the most powerful man alive.
135
00:09:05,364 --> 00:09:07,165
It's quite quixo- quixotic.
136
00:09:07,224 --> 00:09:10,964
Alexander is said to have walked
away remarking, "Had I not been
137
00:09:10,964 --> 00:09:15,184
Alexander, I would have liked to
have been Diogenes." So he s- he
138
00:09:15,184 --> 00:09:17,034
secretly admired his free spirit.
139
00:09:17,955 --> 00:09:19,644
The-- This mockery went on further.
140
00:09:20,165 --> 00:09:25,944
When Alexander himself worshipped as the
god Dionysus, Dia- Diogenes reportedly
141
00:09:26,375 --> 00:09:30,895
proposed that Alexander in turn be
worshipped as Serapis, which was a
142
00:09:30,895 --> 00:09:36,177
direct jab at the time The theorist
Brannum reads the Alexander episode
143
00:09:36,177 --> 00:09:39,877
specifically as the political counterpart
to the confrontation with Plato.
144
00:09:40,377 --> 00:09:46,027
Proof in both cases that Diogenes needed
nothing from power at all, whether
145
00:09:46,027 --> 00:09:48,017
it was philosophical or political.
146
00:09:48,127 --> 00:09:52,687
And Diogenes, unlike his predecessors,
never built a school in any formal sense.
147
00:09:52,987 --> 00:09:54,857
He left no institution behind him.
148
00:09:54,917 --> 00:09:58,297
What carried his critique
forward was a person, not a text.
149
00:09:58,357 --> 00:10:01,767
Crates of Thebes became his most
influential follower and reached
150
00:10:01,767 --> 00:10:04,927
his own philosophical maturity,
according to classicist A.
151
00:10:04,937 --> 00:10:11,607
Long, in the years right after Alexander's
death, the same chaotic years the generals
152
00:10:11,607 --> 00:10:14,197
were fighting over Alexander's empire.
153
00:10:14,567 --> 00:10:19,785
Crates, in turn, is the direct link to
the next generation A young merchant's
154
00:10:19,785 --> 00:10:25,655
son named Zeno arrived in Athens around
312 BC, and he asked a bookseller where
155
00:10:25,655 --> 00:10:29,925
he can find someone like Socrates, and was
pointed toward a man walking past outside.
156
00:10:31,085 --> 00:10:35,945
"Crates, follow that man," the bookseller
said, according to historian Peter Green.
157
00:10:35,985 --> 00:10:39,765
Zeno did, and became a Cynic
himself before eventually founding
158
00:10:39,765 --> 00:10:41,705
his own school, the Stoics.
159
00:10:42,415 --> 00:10:45,715
Again, this is something we'll
discuss in later episodes.
160
00:10:45,865 --> 00:10:50,135
Behind the wit and the theatrics
was an actual philosophical claim,
161
00:10:50,625 --> 00:10:55,055
and specifically one that amounts
to its own idea of progress, and it
162
00:10:55,055 --> 00:10:58,585
was very distinct from every version
the series has covered so far.
163
00:10:58,775 --> 00:11:03,625
Classicist Long reads Diogenes' project
as more than eccentricity or performance.
164
00:11:03,855 --> 00:11:05,435
He sees something much deeper.
165
00:11:05,895 --> 00:11:11,175
Diogenes' real agenda, Long argues, was
a radical critique of the Greek polis.
166
00:11:11,564 --> 00:11:16,745
So he saw Diogenes as a very important
and a serious figure, even though he
167
00:11:16,745 --> 00:11:21,145
couched it in a humorous way, as a
critic of the Greek system directly.
168
00:11:22,465 --> 00:11:24,185
And Diogenes said as much directly.
169
00:11:24,265 --> 00:11:29,785
Classicist John Moles points to Diogenes'
own words describing the polis itself as,
170
00:11:29,825 --> 00:11:35,164
quote, "Against nature." Long identifies
the fuller shape of the critique that
171
00:11:35,164 --> 00:11:40,545
Di- Diogenes held that wealth, fame,
and political power itself, in his own
172
00:11:40,545 --> 00:11:43,624
phrase, had no value in nature whatsoever.
173
00:11:44,914 --> 00:11:49,125
A polis exists in large part to
protect exactly those three things,
174
00:11:49,134 --> 00:11:50,905
so therein lies the conflict.
175
00:11:51,615 --> 00:11:54,765
Diogenes, on the other hand,
rejected all three at once.
176
00:11:54,954 --> 00:11:58,045
But that rejection had a positive
side, not just a negative one.
177
00:11:58,734 --> 00:12:04,114
Diogenes called himself cosmopolites,
a citizen of the cosmos, not
178
00:12:04,115 --> 00:12:06,154
just of one small specific city.
179
00:12:06,965 --> 00:12:08,614
An early globalist, one might argue.
180
00:12:09,535 --> 00:12:14,064
Classicist John Moles argues against
the longstanding scholarly consensus
181
00:12:14,064 --> 00:12:16,254
that this claim was purely negative.
182
00:12:16,715 --> 00:12:19,504
Simply another way of saying
Diogenes belonged nowhere.
183
00:12:19,944 --> 00:12:23,885
Moles reads it, uh, instead as a
genuine substantive alternative.
184
00:12:24,285 --> 00:12:28,264
Diogenes was proposing a different site
for belonging together, not just not
185
00:12:28,264 --> 00:12:33,325
the city, but the whole of humanity,
understood as one shared community.
186
00:12:33,945 --> 00:12:37,705
So read this way, the Cynic
idea of progress wasn't
187
00:12:37,705 --> 00:12:39,215
just a rejection of society.
188
00:12:39,615 --> 00:12:43,145
The Cynic idea of progress does not
abandon the question of how a person
189
00:12:43,145 --> 00:12:44,564
should live in relation to others.
190
00:12:45,005 --> 00:12:49,904
Instead, it relocates the question
entirely from citizenship in a
191
00:12:50,434 --> 00:12:54,684
particular city-state to membership
in a community with no borders at all.
192
00:12:54,744 --> 00:12:57,155
Historian Peter Green
places that relocation in a
193
00:12:57,155 --> 00:12:58,695
wider intellectual current.
194
00:12:59,601 --> 00:13:02,841
The impulse behind Greenargius
did not begin with Diogenes.
195
00:13:03,041 --> 00:13:07,741
He traces it back over a century to
Pythagoras, the Orphics, and Plato himself
196
00:13:07,741 --> 00:13:09,541
actually, which is very interesting.
197
00:13:10,171 --> 00:13:14,011
What Alexander's conquest changed
was not the impulse, but its force.
198
00:13:14,441 --> 00:13:18,821
In Green's words, "Subjugation of the
Greek city-states to outside control, it
199
00:13:18,821 --> 00:13:23,381
just simply accelerated and intensified
an already existing process." The Cynics
200
00:13:23,391 --> 00:13:28,361
did not invent the process of rejecting
the polis, but instead, according
201
00:13:28,361 --> 00:13:32,431
to Green, they radicalized it at the
exact moment that the polis had the
202
00:13:32,431 --> 00:13:34,581
least power left to protect anyone.
203
00:13:36,181 --> 00:13:41,311
So that radicalism echoes directly in
the early work of Zeno of Citium, the
204
00:13:41,311 --> 00:13:46,471
same young Cynic converted, introduced
above, later the founder of the Stoics.
205
00:13:47,291 --> 00:13:52,051
His treatise on the ideal state, The
Republic, was shaped so thoroughly by
206
00:13:52,070 --> 00:13:56,381
Cynic thinking, Professor Green states,
that it was joked to have been written on
207
00:13:56,381 --> 00:14:02,261
the dog's tail, a statement that points
to the original Cynic himself, Diogenes.
208
00:14:02,271 --> 00:14:07,570
And Zeno wanted everything that made
up an entirely Greek city, temples,
209
00:14:07,611 --> 00:14:13,000
courts, gymnasiums, money, local
loyalties, swept entirely away.
210
00:14:13,741 --> 00:14:18,781
Green calls this, quote, "A frontal
assault on Plato and Aristotle, since
211
00:14:18,781 --> 00:14:22,860
both of them in their own way built
their ideal ruler around the polis, while
212
00:14:22,860 --> 00:14:25,250
the Cynics held the polis in contempt."
213
00:14:25,391 --> 00:14:31,221
Green adds, "Now that its real power
was broken." So ancient critics leveled
214
00:14:31,221 --> 00:14:36,230
a specific complaint at the Cynics,
claiming that it lacked a telos, a
215
00:14:36,241 --> 00:14:41,680
stated end, or an ultimate goal, that it
was random, the kind of thing that let
216
00:14:41,690 --> 00:14:45,670
other schools claim status as a genuine
philosophy rather than a lifestyle.
217
00:14:46,250 --> 00:14:47,011
So this is important.
218
00:14:47,021 --> 00:14:49,370
We've discussed telos
in previous episodes.
219
00:14:50,061 --> 00:14:54,031
It, you know, basically their implication
was, was that this, this particular
220
00:14:54,031 --> 00:14:56,660
movement had no end goals whatsoever.
221
00:14:58,641 --> 00:15:02,090
Classicist Brock Branham and Marie
Caves traced that expectation
222
00:15:02,091 --> 00:15:04,280
itself directly back to Aristotle.
223
00:15:04,720 --> 00:15:09,591
Philosophical schools only began being
defined by their sovereign good following
224
00:15:09,670 --> 00:15:12,331
Aristotle's work, the Nicomachean Ethics.
225
00:15:12,381 --> 00:15:16,650
Diogenes and Antisthenes
never stated one at all.
226
00:15:17,440 --> 00:15:21,603
It was a later Stoic, Apollodorus of
Solutia, applying to Diogenes and the
227
00:15:21,603 --> 00:15:26,640
Cynics retroactively after their death
and gave them a telos, interestingly,
228
00:15:26,690 --> 00:15:31,101
living in accordance with virtue decades
after Diogenes was dead as part of an
229
00:15:31,110 --> 00:15:36,240
argument linking the Cynics and the
Stoics in one unbroken line to Socrates.
230
00:15:37,110 --> 00:15:41,900
Diogenes, in other words, never organized
his life around a stated goal at all.
231
00:15:42,450 --> 00:15:44,690
What he had instead was a practice.
232
00:15:44,851 --> 00:15:47,560
Much of this section has been
about what the Cynics rejected.
233
00:15:48,631 --> 00:15:51,491
Well, it's also worth being clear
about what they actually stood for.
234
00:15:51,580 --> 00:15:54,311
The theorist Long traces
it to self-sufficiency.
235
00:15:56,183 --> 00:16:00,883
Autarkia achieved through deliberate
training and the same discipline in
236
00:16:00,883 --> 00:16:06,373
Diogenes' word that lets an athlete
earn a skill Branham identifies a
237
00:16:06,373 --> 00:16:10,863
second virtue behind both the Plato
and the Alexander confrontations.
238
00:16:11,613 --> 00:16:16,413
Parrhesia, the freedom to speak the
truth to anyone, regardless of rank.
239
00:16:17,703 --> 00:16:21,113
Mole adds a third positive
component, cosmopolitanism,
240
00:16:22,733 --> 00:16:26,463
kinship with all of humanity,
not merely the absence of a city.
241
00:16:26,913 --> 00:16:31,863
And underneath all three, Long argues,
sits a single standard, living according
242
00:16:31,863 --> 00:16:35,603
to nature, which is physis over nomos.
243
00:16:36,573 --> 00:16:38,053
Physis, nature.
244
00:16:38,333 --> 00:16:41,513
Nomos are just the standards of the,
of the world that you're living in.
245
00:16:42,253 --> 00:16:46,193
So the same distinction that defined
Diogenes' whole project from the start.
246
00:16:47,353 --> 00:16:51,093
Now, Aristotle, for his part,
knew of Diogenes directly.
247
00:16:52,403 --> 00:16:56,873
His own work, Rhetoric, quotes a
joke of Diogenes, naming him only
248
00:16:56,873 --> 00:17:01,433
as The Dog, the earliest surviving
mention of a Cynic anywhere in
249
00:17:01,433 --> 00:17:03,663
Greek literature, confirmed by Long.
250
00:17:03,783 --> 00:17:07,993
So Aristotle built an entire ethics on a
citizen fulfilling his nature inside the
251
00:17:07,993 --> 00:17:13,293
city, whereas Diogenes built one on a life
that had no use for the city whatsoever.
252
00:17:13,563 --> 00:17:18,413
Both were answers to the same
question: What does progress toward
253
00:17:18,413 --> 00:17:20,373
a good life actually require?
254
00:17:20,582 --> 00:17:23,713
And neither man would have
recognized the other answer as
255
00:17:23,713 --> 00:17:25,993
an answer to progress at all.
256
00:17:26,122 --> 00:17:30,023
So the Cynics' departure from Aristotle
was not just a matter of degree.
257
00:17:31,293 --> 00:17:36,442
Simply stated, Aristotle argued that
flourishing depended, depended directly on
258
00:17:36,442 --> 00:17:40,983
the polis, on the city-state, and it was
built and sustained by the citizens within
259
00:17:40,983 --> 00:17:42,973
that city-state who were acting together.
260
00:17:43,052 --> 00:17:48,573
Now, Diogenes argued the opposite, that
the polis itself was against the laws
261
00:17:48,573 --> 00:17:52,762
of nature, and that a person needed
nothing from it in order to live well.
262
00:17:54,063 --> 00:17:58,723
One built an entire ethics around
belonging to a political community,
263
00:17:58,842 --> 00:18:03,432
Aristotle, while the other built his
around needing no community smaller
264
00:18:03,433 --> 00:18:05,312
than the entire whole of humanity.
265
00:18:06,332 --> 00:18:10,392
Between these two positions, there
was no obvious room for compromise.
266
00:18:10,402 --> 00:18:12,313
They were completely,
they're completely different.
267
00:18:12,592 --> 00:18:16,362
Now, the Cynics were not the only answer
to the world that Alexander left behind.
268
00:18:16,412 --> 00:18:21,283
Zeno's Stoics and Epicurus followers were
working out their own answers in the same
269
00:18:21,293 --> 00:18:26,212
Athenian streets in the same unsettled
decades following Alexander's departure.
270
00:18:26,353 --> 00:18:30,372
Now, whether the Stoics kept that contempt
once their own school matured or found
271
00:18:30,373 --> 00:18:34,172
their way back to something closer to
Aristotle's picture is a question that the
272
00:18:34,172 --> 00:18:36,453
next two episodes will take up directly.
273
00:18:36,493 --> 00:18:40,892
Epicurus, working on it almost exactly
the same time, will raise a different
274
00:18:40,892 --> 00:18:45,513
question again, not what a person needs
from the city, but whether a person
275
00:18:45,513 --> 00:18:47,442
needs the city's business at all.
276
00:18:48,543 --> 00:18:51,982
What comes next is what two more
schools of thought decided a person
277
00:18:52,073 --> 00:18:55,752
actually needs, and how close
or how far each of them ended
278
00:18:55,752 --> 00:18:57,463
up from where Aristotle started.
279
00:18:58,922 --> 00:19:01,092
Look forward to discussing
this with you the next time.
280
00:19:01,293 --> 00:19:02,682
Thanks for listening to part one.