Two Depressions, One Cause? Michael Roberts on 1873, 1929, and the Rate of Profit
In this second of a three-part conversation, Marxist economist Michael Roberts takes the central claim from Part One — that the 2008 crash opened a long depression — back to the two historical cases on which his 2016 book The Long Depression rests. He begins with the 1870s, answering the Austrian-school argument that no depression took place and a rival monetary explanation tied to the gold standard; his reply draws on the data for Britain, the hegemonic economy of the period. He then sets out the mechanism he takes from the third volume of Marx’s Capital: capitalists invest only when it is profitable, and competition drives them to invest ever more in machinery relative to labor, which Roberts argues pulls the rate of profit down over time, held back for a while by counteracting tendencies. The same pattern, on his account, ran beneath the stock-market boom of the late 1920s and the slump of the 1930s. The episode closes on the rival crisis theories Roberts contests — policy error, unregulated finance, underconsumption, and overproduction — and on his case for profitability as the driver of booms and slumps alike.
About Our GuestMichael Roberts worked in the City of London as an economist for over 30 years before retiring. He is the author of several books: The Great Recession: A Marxist View (2009); The Long Depression (2016), the book at the center of this conversation; World in Crisis (joint editor, 2018); Marx 200: His Economics (2018); and Engels 200: His Economics (2020). With Guglielmo Carchedi, he co-authored Capitalism in the 21st Century (2023). His new book, Time Is Running Out: The World Economy in the 2020s and Beyond, is forthcoming in December 2026. He writes regularly at thenextrecession.wordpress.com.
Show Notes & Timestamps00:00 Profit Drives Capitalism
01:41 Setting Up Three Crises
02:38 1873 Depression Debates
05:22 Profitability Causes Slumps
07:22 Marx’s Law Explained
09:56 Organic Composition Basics
13:13 Counteracting Tendencies
15:07 Profit Waves Through History
18:32 From 1929 to War Economy
23:58 Competing Crisis Theories
28:06 Why Profit Matters Most
Key Concepts & TermsOrganic Composition of Capital — Roberts’s term, following Marx, for the growing weight of investment in machinery and plant relative to labor as capitalists compete. Roberts credits this process with making capitalism dynamic, and locates its weak point in Marx’s view that value can come only from human labor: machines help workers create more value but produce none themselves, so a rising share of investment in machines pulls the rate of profit down over time.
Counteracting Tendencies — The factors Roberts says Marx sets out in Volume 3 of Capital that slow the fall in the rate of profit: employing more workers, longer hours, more intense work, much cheaper machinery, and profit brought home through foreign trade and investment. On Roberts’s account each has limits, so the general law reasserts itself over a period of time.
Underconsumption — One of the rival crisis theories Roberts contests: that workers’ wages are too low to buy all the goods capitalists produce. Roberts answers, citing Engels, that this is always the case and so cannot explain why booms give way to slumps; he adds that most sales take place between capitalists.
Overproduction — The rival theory, as Roberts describes it, that capitalists keep producing without limit until the economy goes over a cliff. Roberts replies that a slump is overproduction, but that the theory does not say why growth runs smoothly and then suddenly collapses, or why booms return afterward.
Fascinating Historical InsightsA Depression Engels Feared Would Lead to War — Roberts notes that Marx died in 1883, in the middle of the first long depression, and that his close colleague Engels wrote about it at length. On Roberts’s account, Engels saw something different from another round of boom and slump: a depression that might last, and one that could set the capitalist powers fighting over the available profits. Roberts credits Engels with predicting the First World War on this basis.
Britain, the Hegemonic Economy — Roberts reminds listeners that in the late nineteenth century the leading economy was Britain, not the United States, with Germany and France rising. Against the claim that the 1870s saw no depression, he points to contemporaries in the 1870s and 1880s who were convinced one was under way, and to data showing Britain’s growth running at a lower trend than in the previous period, documented in detail by scholars he cites in the book.
Euphoria on the Stock Market, Falling Profits Underneath — Roberts says the Roaring Twenties looked like an upswing, especially in the United States, while profitability was already falling beneath it. Investors borrowed heavily to buy stocks in a boom he likens to the present, and the mainstream economists of the time, by his account, expected no collapse. After the 1929 crash he describes a decade without recovery, with Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath as a portrait of the period, ended only when governments built a war economy.
Engels’s Reply to Underconsumption — Roberts presents Engels’s answer to the argument that workers lack the wages to buy what capitalists produce: that is always the case, so it cannot explain booms and slumps. His illustration is the headphones used for the recording, tracing the separate capitalists who made the metal, the wires, and the sound system and sold to one another, to show that, on his account, most sales run between capitalists.
Resources & Further ReadingPrimary Sources
- Michael Roberts, The Long Depression (2016) — the book at the center of this conversation, in which Roberts says he sets out the figures on profitability behind his argument.
Works Discussed
- Karl Marx, Capital, Volume 3 — Roberts’s source for the law of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall and for the counteracting tendencies.
- John Steinbeck, The Grapes of Wrath — the novel Roberts cites as a portrait of the United States in the 1930s.
Roberts characterizes Marx’s and Engels’s arguments in his own words, and no specific edition or page of Capital is cited in this episode. He also refers, without naming specific works, to the Austrian-school economists of the 1870s, to scholars of British industrial production and trade, and to Engels’s writings on the depression; none of these are listed here.
Coming Up NextPart Three brings Roberts’s argument into the present: what it means for a generation earning less than their parents, what role AI might play going forward, and where he thinks capitalism goes from here. Part Three lands in two weeks.
Listen & SubscribeWebsite — notionsofprogress.com
Email: marshall@notionsofprogress.com
About the ShowNotions of Progress is a podcast tracing ideas of progress from antiquity to the age of artificial intelligence. Hosted by Marshall Madow — an independent researcher whose MA in History (Cambridge) examined Georges Sorel’s epistemology of myth, and whose MSc (Oxford, Saïd Business School) focused on Complexity Science and Leadership — the show surfaces the debates rather than settling them, tracing how thinkers from Hesiod to Hayek, Plato to Peter Haff, have understood what it means for humanity to move forward, at what cost, and for whom.
00:00 - Profit Drives Capitalism
01:41 - Setting Up Three Crises
02:38 - 1873 Depression Debates
05:22 - Profitability Causes Slumps
07:22 - Marx's Law Explained
09:56 - Organic Composition Basics
13:13 - Counteracting Tendencies
15:07 - Profit Waves Through History
18:32 - From 1929 to War Economy
23:58 - Competing Crisis Theories
28:06 - Why Profit Matters Most
00:00:00,186 --> 00:00:03,356
Speaker: But, but I think the
fundamental Marxist thing is that
2
00:00:03,356 --> 00:00:05,276
what matters in a capitalist economy?
3
00:00:05,936 --> 00:00:06,816
Profitability.
4
00:00:07,526 --> 00:00:10,065
Capitalists won't invest
unless it's profitable.
5
00:00:10,645 --> 00:00:16,006
So what you get is a tendency for the
profitability of capital to fall over time
6
00:00:16,155 --> 00:00:18,285
as capitalists compete and try to expand.
7
00:00:18,566 --> 00:00:23,135
This is a fundamental law of, if you
like, the contradiction within capitalism.
8
00:00:23,425 --> 00:00:24,955
It can only come from human labor.
9
00:00:24,956 --> 00:00:25,636
Let's think about it.
10
00:00:26,015 --> 00:00:30,275
Uh, if nobody worked tomorrow and the
machines were there, the factories
11
00:00:30,276 --> 00:00:33,815
are there, and AI is there, and you
still can't⦠still need somebody
12
00:00:33,816 --> 00:00:35,195
to look after the data centers.
13
00:00:35,435 --> 00:00:38,245
If nobody, human labor was
involved, what would happen?
14
00:00:38,255 --> 00:00:39,416
Everything would collapse.
15
00:00:39,886 --> 00:00:41,436
There would be no value created.
16
00:00:41,785 --> 00:00:44,545
It's, machines don't create value.
17
00:00:44,595 --> 00:00:48,735
What they do is they help human
beings to create more value, but
18
00:00:48,735 --> 00:00:50,755
they don't produce value themselves
19
00:01:41,523 --> 00:01:43,703
Marshall: And that's what I want ⦠And
that's what actually I wanted to guide
20
00:01:43,703 --> 00:01:46,853
you through because, again- Mm ⦠I feel,
I thought if we look ⦠I wanna look
21
00:01:46,853 --> 00:01:49,943
at the three periods in a, in a little
bit of depth just so I can understand,
22
00:01:49,983 --> 00:01:54,153
A, you know, beginning with the panic
of 1873, what were some of the critics?
23
00:01:54,173 --> 00:01:57,293
And then how would you, how would
you, would you say that Marx
24
00:01:57,333 --> 00:01:58,863
would have explained actually what
25
00:01:58,893 --> 00:02:00,833
or the correct framework
in, in your opinion.
26
00:02:01,063 --> 00:02:03,903
I'd like to understand kind of like what
some of the, you know, the counter opin-
27
00:02:03,923 --> 00:02:07,113
the counter opinions were- Yeah ⦠at
that time and why they were off base.
28
00:02:07,113 --> 00:02:09,993
And beginning with 1873,
what was the, kind of the
29
00:02:09,993 --> 00:02:11,213
characteristics, if you don't mind?
30
00:02:11,213 --> 00:02:12,503
Just a little bit of historical- Mm
31
00:02:12,703 --> 00:02:15,343
background to what, what led up
to that, and then what were, what
32
00:02:15,343 --> 00:02:17,933
were the main, the mainstream
economists⦠A- and others, by the way.
33
00:02:17,933 --> 00:02:21,083
You talk about, you know, you, you
come up with ⦠You, you don't just
34
00:02:21,083 --> 00:02:22,273
talk about mainstream economists.
35
00:02:22,273 --> 00:02:25,563
You talk about, uh, uh,
neoliberal econ- economics.
36
00:02:25,563 --> 00:02:26,753
You talk about a lot of different
37
00:02:26,753 --> 00:02:29,593
There's a lot of different, uh-
Yeah ⦠varying opinions on this.
38
00:02:29,713 --> 00:02:31,943
So if you don't mind, Michael, it would
be helpful to kind of walk through
39
00:02:31,943 --> 00:02:35,633
so we can understand the range of, of
views for each one of these periods
40
00:02:35,633 --> 00:02:37,403
t- and then taking us up to today.
41
00:02:37,593 --> 00:02:37,723
Well,
42
00:02:37,723 --> 00:02:38,303
Michael: let's look at
the- But beginning with
43
00:02:38,303 --> 00:02:38,743
Marshall: 1873
44
00:02:38,773 --> 00:02:41,523
â¦
Michael: late 19th century
depression, as I call it.
45
00:02:41,983 --> 00:02:42,273
Yep.
46
00:02:42,513 --> 00:02:44,933
The counterargument to that,
that it wasn't a depression.
47
00:02:45,043 --> 00:02:46,243
That's what some- Right ⦠people say.
48
00:02:46,533 --> 00:02:51,093
That, uh, actually, there was
still growth, that, uh, uh, incomes
49
00:02:51,123 --> 00:02:55,793
went up, so the arguments go, and
that really this was not a period
50
00:02:55,793 --> 00:02:57,083
which you can call a depression.
51
00:02:57,483 --> 00:03:00,813
There, uh, that's the main
a- counterargument to it.
52
00:03:01,143 --> 00:03:03,473
Uh, there are th- secondary arguments.
53
00:03:03,653 --> 00:03:06,713
Yes, it was a depression, but it was
not the reason you Marxists give.
54
00:03:07,173 --> 00:03:08,403
It was a different reason.
55
00:03:08,673 --> 00:03:12,643
Uh, they would argue that because,
um, uh, because money was tied
56
00:03:12,753 --> 00:03:17,595
to the international gold, gold
being money internationally.
57
00:03:17,885 --> 00:03:23,605
And because gold was in increasingly,
uh, in short supply, it drove down
58
00:03:24,065 --> 00:03:27,955
the ability of economies to grow
because there wasn't enough gold.
59
00:03:27,955 --> 00:03:30,145
The gold standard was operating.
60
00:03:30,405 --> 00:03:31,455
That's another theory.
61
00:03:31,855 --> 00:03:34,555
Uh, but the main one is that
it wasn't a depression, that
62
00:03:34,555 --> 00:03:35,945
it was, there was still growth.
63
00:03:36,245 --> 00:03:38,705
And the- And this was the Austrian
school eco- economist at that time,
64
00:03:38,705 --> 00:03:42,395
that were- The gold one ⦠Yeah, the
Austrians said there was no depression,
65
00:03:42,695 --> 00:03:44,865
that, uh, it was generally okay.
66
00:03:45,155 --> 00:03:49,735
And if there was any decline, it was due
to the fact that, um, uh, there, there's
67
00:03:49,765 --> 00:03:54,145
been excessive debt s- uh, spent in the
previous period which had to be unwound.
68
00:03:54,405 --> 00:03:55,645
But on the whole- Mm ⦠they deny it.
69
00:03:55,665 --> 00:03:57,105
They denied that there was a depression.
70
00:03:57,465 --> 00:04:01,085
All I can say, uh, as I say in the
book, I explain that⦠Well, first
71
00:04:01,085 --> 00:04:06,265
of all, contemporaries at the time,
in the 1870s, 1880s, were pretty
72
00:04:06,265 --> 00:04:07,835
convinced that there was a depression.
73
00:04:08,315 --> 00:04:14,465
And I also cite a number of important,
um, scholars who looked at the growth in
74
00:04:14,565 --> 00:04:17,935
industrial production and trade and so
on, particularly in the case of Britain.
75
00:04:18,135 --> 00:04:21,825
Because we have to remember, Marshall,
that in the late 19th century, the
76
00:04:21,825 --> 00:04:24,885
big economy was the UK or Britain.
77
00:04:24,965 --> 00:04:26,075
It wasn't the United States.
78
00:04:26,075 --> 00:04:27,215
The United States was coming up.
79
00:04:27,485 --> 00:04:27,915
Mm-hmm.
80
00:04:27,915 --> 00:04:29,295
Germany was coming up,
France was coming up.
81
00:04:29,305 --> 00:04:32,975
But Britain was the, what we like to
call, the hegemonic economic power.
82
00:04:33,305 --> 00:04:36,645
Nowadays, in the late 20th
century, and now it's been the US.
83
00:04:36,925 --> 00:04:38,805
But, uh, and then it was the UK.
84
00:04:38,805 --> 00:04:42,155
And if you look at the data on the
UK, the UK was doing really badly.
85
00:04:42,165 --> 00:04:44,175
It was slowing down sharply.
86
00:04:44,495 --> 00:04:48,655
Uh, wasn't always going into a slump,
but it would⦠not recovering very much.
87
00:04:48,655 --> 00:04:51,735
We had a very, a lower trend growth
than we had the previous period.
88
00:04:51,735 --> 00:04:54,085
And I give the, the data
on this to show this.
89
00:04:54,095 --> 00:04:59,745
So I think the arguments that it wasn't
a depression can be convincingly defeated
90
00:05:00,025 --> 00:05:03,865
by looking at the data, particularly
in the case of the UK, and the scholars
91
00:05:03,865 --> 00:05:09,115
who wrote it since then pointing
that out in very much, uh, in detail.
92
00:05:09,515 --> 00:05:13,615
And the other point is that, well, if
it's, if it was a depression, you've got
93
00:05:13,615 --> 00:05:15,465
the wrong argument for the depression.
94
00:05:15,465 --> 00:05:16,655
It wasn't caused by that.
95
00:05:17,065 --> 00:05:18,795
Uh, it's caused by currencies,
96
00:05:19,485 --> 00:05:19,885
Marshall: it's caused by gold.
97
00:05:19,885 --> 00:05:20,845
A monetary event, you mentioned-
98
00:05:20,985 --> 00:05:21,255
Michael: Yeah,
99
00:05:21,735 --> 00:05:22,041
Marshall: yeah ⦠uh, at that
100
00:05:22,041 --> 00:05:22,053
Michael: point.
101
00:05:22,053 --> 00:05:22,065
Yeah.
102
00:05:22,065 --> 00:05:26,815
But, but I think the fundamental Marxist
thing is that what matters in a capitalist
103
00:05:26,815 --> 00:05:31,875
economy, profitability Capitalists
won't invest unless it's profitable.
104
00:05:32,735 --> 00:05:32,795
Mm-hmm.
105
00:05:32,795 --> 00:05:35,315
If profitability is going up ⦠What
do I mean by profitability?
106
00:05:35,315 --> 00:05:42,045
So if I invest $100, uh, million
in machinery, plant around the
107
00:05:42,045 --> 00:05:44,965
world, and I employ a load of
workers, I spend 100 million.
108
00:05:45,295 --> 00:05:48,305
I wanna earn more than 100
million, otherwise I'm not
109
00:05:48,305 --> 00:05:49,505
gonna continue production.
110
00:05:49,875 --> 00:05:53,515
So next, in the first year, I
want at least get some- making
111
00:05:53,515 --> 00:05:54,815
profit over that 100 million.
112
00:05:54,965 --> 00:05:58,625
Maybe I can spread out the cost of
that over, by borrowing over a period
113
00:05:58,625 --> 00:06:00,395
of time, but I've gotta make a profit.
114
00:06:00,585 --> 00:06:01,725
It's gotta be profitable.
115
00:06:01,955 --> 00:06:06,385
And if it starts not being profitable,
then I'm gonna start not spending
116
00:06:06,385 --> 00:06:10,775
that money on new machinery or
maintaining the existing machinery or
117
00:06:10,805 --> 00:06:14,665
laying off workers, closing down this
particular s- factory site or so on.
118
00:06:14,935 --> 00:06:19,305
I'll start trying to cut costs to
try and maintain, uh, profitability.
119
00:06:19,475 --> 00:06:22,285
And if that doesn't work, then there'll
be a certain point, if, especially
120
00:06:22,285 --> 00:06:26,335
if everybody's in the same situation,
not just one capitalist company, but
121
00:06:26,355 --> 00:06:29,595
all the major capitalist economies
or capitalist companies are now
122
00:06:29,595 --> 00:06:31,755
in trouble, then you get a slump.
123
00:06:31,825 --> 00:06:33,005
That's why you get a slump.
124
00:06:33,225 --> 00:06:36,885
You get a slump- And you- Yeah, because
profitability drops to the point where
125
00:06:36,885 --> 00:06:40,245
capitalists can't see them gonna make a
profit, so they've gotta lay off workers,
126
00:06:40,475 --> 00:06:46,545
close down their factories, uh, but buy
each other out to, as it were, to in-
127
00:06:46,555 --> 00:06:51,165
increase the, uh ⦠Get rid of the weaker
people so that they're in a position to
128
00:06:51,175 --> 00:06:53,505
take advantage, uh, of that situation
129
00:06:54,511 --> 00:06:58,141
Marshall: And, and, and I wanna, I wanna
definitely kind of hold that thought
130
00:06:58,221 --> 00:07:01,011
just in terms of the ra- the falling rate
of profitability 'cause you, 'cause you
131
00:07:01,011 --> 00:07:02,301
raised that point throughout the book.
132
00:07:02,551 --> 00:07:02,571
Yeah.
133
00:07:02,581 --> 00:07:06,091
And it was hard for me to under- to
quite get a handle on whether or not
134
00:07:06,091 --> 00:07:11,041
that was the causative effect or that
was just the outcome of the other
135
00:07:11,101 --> 00:07:14,021
distortions to the market that led
to⦠Like, in other words, is, is
136
00:07:14,021 --> 00:07:17,081
that what caused the depression or is
that actually just what you observe?
137
00:07:17,081 --> 00:07:21,001
Is that phenomenology at the end
of the, uh, at the end of the, the
138
00:07:21,001 --> 00:07:22,061
end stage of this depression cycle?
139
00:07:22,061 --> 00:07:22,151
It's
140
00:07:22,151 --> 00:07:25,401
Michael: a very good point, Marshall,
because that, that's exactly s- arguments
141
00:07:25,401 --> 00:07:29,921
against, uh, um, this law of the
tendency of the rate of profit to fall.
142
00:07:29,951 --> 00:07:33,261
Just to explain to viewers that-
Please ⦠Marx came ⦠In the third,
143
00:07:33,321 --> 00:07:36,761
volume three of Capital, uh, that's where
you can find it if you wanna read it.
144
00:07:36,801 --> 00:07:39,921
By the way, viewers, it's not
difficult, volume three, to read.
145
00:07:39,921 --> 00:07:41,111
It's quite interesting, so.
146
00:07:41,551 --> 00:07:44,341
Volume one's tricky, but volume
three is relatively easy.
147
00:07:44,351 --> 00:07:48,251
In there he explains that,
um, the basic contradiction of
148
00:07:48,251 --> 00:07:53,351
capitalism is to try to increase
productivity to get more production
149
00:07:53,361 --> 00:07:55,011
out of the workers for less cost.
150
00:07:55,361 --> 00:07:58,061
But over a period of time, in order
to do that, because capitalists are
151
00:07:58,061 --> 00:08:01,901
competing with each other all the time
to do this, it's not one capitalist.
152
00:08:02,191 --> 00:08:05,081
Everybody's trying to compete and get
an advantage over the other, get better
153
00:08:05,121 --> 00:08:07,321
market share, better profit, and so on.
154
00:08:07,661 --> 00:08:09,291
Then they ⦠How do they do that?
155
00:08:09,291 --> 00:08:12,381
The best way to do it, I mean, they
can make work- their workers work
156
00:08:12,381 --> 00:08:15,661
harder or they can do all kinds of
horrible things to their workers.
157
00:08:15,661 --> 00:08:19,191
But the main reason is to introduce
a technology and machinery which is
158
00:08:19,211 --> 00:08:24,311
more effective in productive, uh,
ex- expansion than somebody else's.
159
00:08:24,581 --> 00:08:28,261
So if there's a new technology comes in,
that capitalist takes advantage of it.
160
00:08:28,261 --> 00:08:31,961
He gets an advantage in profitability
'cause he can sell his goods, uh,
161
00:08:32,201 --> 00:08:36,021
at the market price and its cost
are letter- less, so he's make- than
162
00:08:36,031 --> 00:08:37,321
the others, so he's making a profit.
163
00:08:37,681 --> 00:08:40,941
But if everybody then starts using
the machine, which inevitably
164
00:08:40,941 --> 00:08:42,511
happens, we call it diffusion.
165
00:08:42,791 --> 00:08:47,061
Like in AI- Mm ⦠if everybody starts
using AI, then the profitability of AI,
166
00:08:47,371 --> 00:08:51,511
uh, which doesn't exist at the moment,
but if it did, starts to get to fall away.
167
00:08:51,711 --> 00:08:57,051
So what you get is a tendency for the
profitability of capital to fall over time
168
00:08:57,191 --> 00:08:59,331
as capitalists compete and try to expand.
169
00:08:59,611 --> 00:09:04,181
This is a fundamental law of, if you
like, the contradiction within capitalism.
170
00:09:04,471 --> 00:09:08,965
Because capitalism is a system
of production for profit It won't
171
00:09:08,975 --> 00:09:11,385
produce unless there's profit.
172
00:09:11,655 --> 00:09:15,495
If profitability starts to fall,
it will start considering not
173
00:09:15,695 --> 00:09:17,735
producing or investing anymore.
174
00:09:18,175 --> 00:09:18,945
That's the way around.
175
00:09:18,945 --> 00:09:21,965
There are some people argue and
say, "Well, if the capitalists don't
176
00:09:21,965 --> 00:09:25,715
invest and don't consume anything,
profits fall for everybody else."
177
00:09:26,075 --> 00:09:30,345
So they put it round the other way and
say, as you said, "Profitability is the
178
00:09:30,345 --> 00:09:36,265
result of a ca- collapse in investment."
I don't, I, I don't ⦠theoretically
179
00:09:36,605 --> 00:09:39,845
and empirically, I don't ⦠I
think we can refute that argument.
180
00:09:39,855 --> 00:09:43,565
Mm. That it is the way that Marx
said, "When profitability and
181
00:09:43,565 --> 00:09:46,925
profits fall, then investment
falls, and then you get the slump."
182
00:09:47,215 --> 00:09:48,325
It's that way around.
183
00:09:48,325 --> 00:09:50,105
And is this what- And we
can show it empirically.
184
00:09:51,015 --> 00:09:54,075
Marshall: And is this what you call the
organic composition of capital data?
185
00:09:54,145 --> 00:09:54,925
Is that, like, what's-
186
00:09:54,925 --> 00:09:55,825
Michael: Yes ⦠involved
187
00:09:55,825 --> 00:09:56,225
Marshall: in that?
188
00:09:56,725 --> 00:09:58,095
Michael: So you've got a rate of profit.
189
00:09:58,235 --> 00:10:03,005
So if I invest 100 million, if I'm
investing more and more in machinery
190
00:10:03,005 --> 00:10:06,505
as opposed to labor, it doesn't say
I'm reducing my labor force, but I'm
191
00:10:06,515 --> 00:10:10,455
invest- putting more and more money into
factories, machines, et cetera, which are
192
00:10:10,455 --> 00:10:13,185
not people, uh, then I've got an increase.
193
00:10:13,185 --> 00:10:17,125
That's what Marx called, uh, the
natural process of capitalism.
194
00:10:17,195 --> 00:10:19,915
It's, uh ⦠he called it
an organic composition.
195
00:10:19,915 --> 00:10:21,315
It's an organic process.
196
00:10:21,575 --> 00:10:25,345
The capitalists competing with each
other to take advantage will inevitably
197
00:10:25,345 --> 00:10:27,175
invest more and more in technology.
198
00:10:27,175 --> 00:10:29,465
That's what made capitalism
dynamic in many ways.
199
00:10:29,465 --> 00:10:31,235
It dramatically took it forward.
200
00:10:31,585 --> 00:10:33,615
But it has an Achilles heel.
201
00:10:33,615 --> 00:10:38,715
It has this contradiction that in order
to do that, eventually a situation
202
00:10:38,725 --> 00:10:42,775
arises where there's so much invested
in machinery that there's not enough
203
00:10:42,785 --> 00:10:44,925
profit being made to compensate for that.
204
00:10:44,935 --> 00:10:45,435
Why?
205
00:10:45,715 --> 00:10:49,305
Because Marx argued that mostly
profit comes, profit must
206
00:10:49,325 --> 00:10:51,245
come from human labor power.
207
00:10:51,805 --> 00:10:53,325
It can only come from human labor.
208
00:10:53,325 --> 00:10:54,015
Let's think about it.
209
00:10:54,395 --> 00:10:58,655
Uh, if nobody worked tomorrow and the
machines were there and the factories
210
00:10:58,655 --> 00:11:02,445
are there and AI is there and you still
can't, still need somebody to look
211
00:11:02,445 --> 00:11:06,615
after the data centers, if nobody, human
labor, was involved, what would happen?
212
00:11:06,635 --> 00:11:07,775
Everything would collapse.
213
00:11:08,265 --> 00:11:09,805
There would be no value created.
214
00:11:10,165 --> 00:11:12,925
It's ⦠machines don't create value.
215
00:11:12,975 --> 00:11:17,105
What they do is they help human
beings to create more value, but
216
00:11:17,105 --> 00:11:19,145
they don't produce value themselves.
217
00:11:19,145 --> 00:11:22,895
That's the fundamental point
of Marx's value theory.
218
00:11:23,075 --> 00:11:26,965
So he's saying if, if, uh, uh,
investment is going more and more
219
00:11:26,965 --> 00:11:30,825
to machines relative to labor, then
there's a tendency for the profitability
220
00:11:31,225 --> 00:11:33,275
overall to start, uh, falling.
221
00:11:33,275 --> 00:11:34,335
It could take a long time.
222
00:11:34,545 --> 00:11:35,485
It could take 20 years.
223
00:11:35,705 --> 00:11:39,235
It's not the ultimate decider of
a slump because that will depend
224
00:11:39,235 --> 00:11:43,045
on whether profits in total
start to fall for capitalists.
225
00:11:43,125 --> 00:11:46,495
Mm. Because they can go on for some time
with a lower rate of profit, and they can
226
00:11:46,495 --> 00:11:48,205
keep expanding and getting more profit.
227
00:11:48,395 --> 00:11:52,975
But eventually, uh, what Marx called
the absolute point will come where
228
00:11:53,195 --> 00:11:55,335
that, uh, s- slump will begin.
229
00:11:55,345 --> 00:12:00,325
So that's ⦠we ⦠Marx's view
is that profits and profitability
230
00:12:00,325 --> 00:12:01,815
drives investment in a slump.
231
00:12:02,265 --> 00:12:04,405
Investment doesn't drive profits.
232
00:12:04,765 --> 00:12:06,985
It's, it's the consequence of profits
233
00:12:08,229 --> 00:12:11,269
Marshall: And you in the book, you,
you talk about this, these ideas
234
00:12:11,359 --> 00:12:14,779
or this, this concept of counter,
counter tendencies, if you will.
235
00:12:14,959 --> 00:12:14,989
Yes.
236
00:12:15,029 --> 00:12:18,139
And so, so just to focus on, on yourâ¦
237
00:12:18,199 --> 00:12:20,639
just what you were talking about
right now, I mean, essentially in a
238
00:12:20,639 --> 00:12:26,439
very simplistic way, if indeed, uh,
the, the, all the labor is taken out
239
00:12:26,439 --> 00:12:28,879
of the system, then there's nobody
to buy the products regardless-
240
00:12:28,889 --> 00:12:29,789
Yeah ⦠of whether the⦠Right, right.
241
00:12:30,159 --> 00:12:34,069
But then, and, and we're gonna continue
on when we talk about the next period,
242
00:12:34,079 --> 00:12:36,399
the, the 1920s, you kind of makeâ¦
243
00:12:36,619 --> 00:12:41,429
There starts to become another, uh,
tactic that the capitalists deploy,
244
00:12:41,429 --> 00:12:45,709
as you discuss in the book, to seek
some kind of a global, a globalized
245
00:12:45,709 --> 00:12:50,029
version or an arbitrage- Mm ⦠if you
will, to either have other people work
246
00:12:50,029 --> 00:12:52,779
cheaper or⦠And I wanna go through
that, but I think that it's important-
247
00:12:52,789 --> 00:12:56,349
Yeah ⦠to understand for people that if
the fundamental argument is that, umâ¦
248
00:12:56,389 --> 00:12:58,919
And here, and I'm not here to, to,
in any way, shape, or form to argue
249
00:12:59,199 --> 00:13:01,809
the, the theory per se, but it's just
more to understand how it operated.
250
00:13:01,919 --> 00:13:02,099
Yeah.
251
00:13:02,129 --> 00:13:05,519
You know, you make some very good points
about the fact that, well, they had
252
00:13:05,519 --> 00:13:09,159
so mu- they had ways that they were
gonna try to, to turn back this tide-
253
00:13:09,229 --> 00:13:10,079
Michael: Yes ⦠if you will.
254
00:13:10,339 --> 00:13:13,269
There's counter tendencies
or counter, counter factors.
255
00:13:13,269 --> 00:13:17,049
In, in this volume three of Capital
game, there's a whole chapter by Marx
256
00:13:17,049 --> 00:13:20,529
saying, "Well, it's not straightforward.
If it was just, uh, machines being
257
00:13:20,529 --> 00:13:24,839
expanded and labor falling away, then
the rate of profit would go down like
258
00:13:24,839 --> 00:13:29,305
a-" Fast like hell and you would, uh,
be, you'd be in permanent refreshing.
259
00:13:29,815 --> 00:13:32,155
But of course, there are counter factors.
260
00:13:32,155 --> 00:13:33,185
Capitalists can counter that.
261
00:13:33,195 --> 00:13:34,125
How do they counter that?
262
00:13:34,325 --> 00:13:38,135
Well, they can ex- they can
employ more workers, uh, because
263
00:13:38,185 --> 00:13:39,625
then that would get more value.
264
00:13:39,795 --> 00:13:42,565
They can also make
workers work longer hours.
265
00:13:42,795 --> 00:13:44,405
That's another way in
which they can do it.
266
00:13:44,785 --> 00:13:48,845
They can increase the intensity
of work, and also the introduction
267
00:13:48,845 --> 00:13:54,345
machines will tend to raise, um,
the rate of, uh, exploitation of
268
00:13:54,345 --> 00:13:57,885
the workers because they're getting
more out of them for the same wages.
269
00:13:58,175 --> 00:14:04,655
So the, that way they can increase the
ratio of profit to wages to compensate for
270
00:14:04,655 --> 00:14:06,985
this tendency for profitability to fall.
271
00:14:07,185 --> 00:14:08,195
That's the fundamental one.
272
00:14:08,205 --> 00:14:11,835
The other one is perhaps they can
get a machine which is 100 times
273
00:14:11,835 --> 00:14:15,565
cheaper than the last machine, so
they massively reduce their costs.
274
00:14:15,565 --> 00:14:18,285
I mean, this is the argument
about AI, that we don't need all
275
00:14:18,285 --> 00:14:20,395
these machines 'cause it's all
gonna be done by others, butâ¦
276
00:14:20,735 --> 00:14:22,405
Or, or it's intangibles.
277
00:14:22,405 --> 00:14:23,205
You just software.
278
00:14:23,205 --> 00:14:24,145
You just need software.
279
00:14:24,445 --> 00:14:27,885
Uh, we, that's another discussion, but
the point is that we can reduce the
280
00:14:27,885 --> 00:14:30,175
cost of machinery, uh, dramatically.
281
00:14:30,175 --> 00:14:34,395
So this rising organic composition
of capital actually falls, so
282
00:14:34,395 --> 00:14:35,805
the rate of profit stays up.
283
00:14:36,165 --> 00:14:38,405
Marx explains all these
counteracting factors.
284
00:14:38,635 --> 00:14:43,415
In a country, if you could ex- ex-
export more and get profit out of
285
00:14:43,685 --> 00:14:48,515
other people's poor wages and poor
conditions and bring that profit back,
286
00:14:48,515 --> 00:14:52,165
then in your own national country,
you can also com- counteract this,
287
00:14:52,165 --> 00:14:56,575
uh, effect, uh, through, um, foreign
trade and through foreign investment.
288
00:14:57,035 --> 00:15:02,835
But the, all these counteracting factors
have limitations, and the general law of
289
00:15:02,875 --> 00:15:07,695
the tendency to fall, uh, uh, exercises
its power over a period of time.
290
00:15:07,695 --> 00:15:10,315
So you can have a period
when profitability rises.
291
00:15:10,325 --> 00:15:15,435
Mm. Uh, for example, from 1850 to 1873,
before this long depression, there was
292
00:15:15,435 --> 00:15:20,895
quite a sharp rise in profitability
in all the major economies of, uh, uh,
293
00:15:20,895 --> 00:15:24,595
Europe and the Unit- even, and the United
States after the Civil War as well.
294
00:15:25,035 --> 00:15:26,685
Uh, but that came to an end.
295
00:15:26,755 --> 00:15:29,615
Then you can see a down
wave in profitability.
296
00:15:29,725 --> 00:15:32,785
In the book, I discuss up
waves in profitability and
297
00:15:32,795 --> 00:15:33,845
down waves in profitability.
298
00:15:34,355 --> 00:15:38,215
So then we get an up wave from the
1890s up to the First World War,
299
00:15:38,665 --> 00:15:40,155
uh, which continues for a while.
300
00:15:40,155 --> 00:15:43,865
Then we have this down wave during the
Great Depression, as you call it, of the
301
00:15:43,865 --> 00:15:47,195
1930s, which is only resolved by a war.
302
00:15:47,585 --> 00:15:51,635
And then we have what, in our, uh,
lifetime, or at least in mine, maybe
303
00:15:51,635 --> 00:15:57,245
not in yours, Marshall, we come to the
golden age of the period from about 1946
304
00:15:57,265 --> 00:16:01,415
to '64, when there's a massive increase
in production, particularly in the US.
305
00:16:01,785 --> 00:16:03,525
Profitability was very high.
306
00:16:03,845 --> 00:16:07,165
Uh, we call that the golden age because
for capitalism it was a golden age.
307
00:16:07,165 --> 00:16:11,935
They can even afford to make concessions
to workers that, uh, pay them more wages
308
00:16:11,935 --> 00:16:14,065
and so on because they were doing so well.
309
00:16:14,225 --> 00:16:18,731
But That nasty old law of
profitability eventually operated.
310
00:16:19,101 --> 00:16:24,401
By the mid-'70s, we had a recession
in⦠The first big one in 1974, '5.
311
00:16:24,701 --> 00:16:28,201
And then we had a very sharp fall
in the profitability of capital
312
00:16:28,241 --> 00:16:29,391
in all the major economies.
313
00:16:29,801 --> 00:16:33,841
We have documented this, not just
me, but lots of Marxist scholars have
314
00:16:33,841 --> 00:16:39,311
documented, and even, even the Federal
Reserve has documented this fall in the
315
00:16:39,311 --> 00:16:45,191
rate of profit from the mid-1970s or
even earlier to nine- the early 1980s.
316
00:16:45,261 --> 00:16:49,921
This was a dramatic fall, which led to
a complete change in the whole situation
317
00:16:50,251 --> 00:16:54,981
of the capitalist economies of the
West, and a completely different set
318
00:16:54,981 --> 00:16:57,131
of policies from the 1980s onwards.
319
00:16:57,181 --> 00:16:58,951
The golden age, uh, was over.
320
00:16:59,341 --> 00:17:03,221
But that, the point here is
that it's profitability that
321
00:17:03,221 --> 00:17:04,831
drives these different waves.
322
00:17:04,931 --> 00:17:08,891
These waves will vary according
to, um, what's the underlying
323
00:17:08,891 --> 00:17:11,661
forces on the organic composition
of capital, which we talked about,
324
00:17:11,661 --> 00:17:13,661
and the counteracting factors.
325
00:17:14,041 --> 00:17:19,761
Uh, and that is the long-term view of
how capitalism works in, in, in my view.
326
00:17:20,031 --> 00:17:24,171
And I think it is not just my view,
but I think it is Marx's view.
327
00:17:24,561 --> 00:17:28,271
Um, and just to remind, just to add
a little bit here, Marshall, that-
328
00:17:28,551 --> 00:17:33,321
Please ⦠uh, Marx, Marx died in nineâ¦
1883, uh, just to let people know.
329
00:17:33,321 --> 00:17:37,991
So if you like, he died in the
middle of this first depression
330
00:17:37,991 --> 00:17:39,831
of the, of the late 19th century.
331
00:17:40,241 --> 00:17:40,471
Marshall: Mm-hmm.
332
00:17:40,481 --> 00:17:44,711
Michael: Uh, he made some comments about,
in his writings at the time, about, uh,
333
00:17:44,711 --> 00:17:47,081
the s- the slump of the 1870s and so on.
334
00:17:47,421 --> 00:17:53,995
But Engels, who was his close colleague
Did write a number of works about
335
00:17:53,995 --> 00:17:55,635
the nature of this depression period.
336
00:17:55,645 --> 00:17:57,465
He mentioned that this
was a different period.
337
00:17:57,755 --> 00:17:59,265
This wasn't just boom and slump again.
338
00:17:59,445 --> 00:18:02,085
This seemed to be a depression
that was gonna go on for some
339
00:18:02,085 --> 00:18:03,795
time, and he was frightened.
340
00:18:03,805 --> 00:18:07,965
He said that if this depression continues,
we could get to a situation where
341
00:18:07,965 --> 00:18:12,525
the major, uh, powers, you know, the
capitalist powers would start fighting
342
00:18:12,715 --> 00:18:17,825
over the available profits that were
in the, uh, the major economies, and
343
00:18:17,825 --> 00:18:19,735
that could lead to a serious world war.
344
00:18:20,005 --> 00:18:23,705
So he predicted the First World
War as a result of this depressing
345
00:18:23,705 --> 00:18:27,115
period, uh, causing the conflict
between the various major powers.
346
00:18:27,355 --> 00:18:31,665
So it has political, uh,
consequences in, in his thought.
347
00:18:32,605 --> 00:18:36,725
Marshall: And, and yet, and I just wanna
again just briefly go back to 1929, right?
348
00:18:36,735 --> 00:18:36,755
Yeah.
349
00:18:36,755 --> 00:18:40,665
Because at that point you're arguing that
prior to that, there was another one of
350
00:18:40,665 --> 00:18:43,195
these, quote-unquote, "recoveries," right?
351
00:18:43,195 --> 00:18:43,215
Yeah.
352
00:18:43,235 --> 00:18:46,805
In the, a- as a result of this,
these conditions that led up to
353
00:18:47,475 --> 00:18:51,895
1917, there was, as you, as you
previously argued today, war in
354
00:18:51,895 --> 00:18:56,265
this particular case was an economic
driver towards, uh, an improvement
355
00:18:56,305 --> 00:18:59,295
in the world economy, and then, then
comes along the Great Depression.
356
00:18:59,305 --> 00:18:59,325
Yeah.
357
00:18:59,505 --> 00:19:03,335
So, so starting with that, that,
that I'm gonna just use your label
358
00:19:03,335 --> 00:19:07,065
as the second depressionary event
that you, that stood out in the book.
359
00:19:07,075 --> 00:19:10,955
Because, 'cause honestly, Michael, you'll,
you know, you, you put together pretty
360
00:19:10,955 --> 00:19:15,555
much an, an unending and continuous
economic history of sl- I mean, if youâ¦
361
00:19:15,735 --> 00:19:21,045
But, but you p- but in particular you,
you, you took these three periods, and you
362
00:19:21,045 --> 00:19:23,505
said that there was something different
about these particular three periods.
363
00:19:23,515 --> 00:19:23,535
Yeah.
364
00:19:23,575 --> 00:19:27,575
So if you don't mind, what was the
conditions that led during, for
365
00:19:27,575 --> 00:19:32,095
the pr- just in the lead up to 1929
that made that one a particularly, a
366
00:19:32,095 --> 00:19:33,695
particularly, you know, pernicious event?
367
00:19:33,965 --> 00:19:34,255
Michael: Right.
368
00:19:34,255 --> 00:19:39,695
Well, the, the basic underlying thing
was that the profitability rates in the
369
00:19:39,695 --> 00:19:46,185
United States and in Europe started to
fall in the latter part of the 20, 1920s.
370
00:19:46,525 --> 00:19:51,545
If you remember, if you read your school
books about the Roaring '20s, uh, was
371
00:19:51,545 --> 00:19:55,505
the period when there was a massive
growth, um, in production it would seem,
372
00:19:55,505 --> 00:19:57,205
and trade, particularly for the US.
373
00:19:57,575 --> 00:20:00,465
Uh, it wasn't so good in
Europe where there was major
374
00:20:00,515 --> 00:20:01,855
political struggles going on.
375
00:20:02,175 --> 00:20:06,095
But you had a period of, it, it
would appear, of, uh, upswing,
376
00:20:06,395 --> 00:20:07,935
uh, for the United States.
377
00:20:08,235 --> 00:20:13,205
And, um, but that, underlying it we found
gradually towards the end of the '20s,
378
00:20:13,735 --> 00:20:15,575
the profitability of capital was falling.
379
00:20:15,575 --> 00:20:20,875
So as we headed towards the end of the
1920s, at that time we had the stock
380
00:20:20,875 --> 00:20:23,645
market in the US had got out of control.
381
00:20:23,655 --> 00:20:26,583
It was- Hy- hypersonically taken off.
382
00:20:26,583 --> 00:20:29,443
It was in, uh, every⦠All the
investors thought everything
383
00:20:29,443 --> 00:20:30,883
was going to be, go on forever.
384
00:20:31,133 --> 00:20:34,993
They were investing, like, over and over
again into the stocks of these various
385
00:20:34,993 --> 00:20:36,833
companies and so on, and banks and so on.
386
00:20:37,303 --> 00:20:41,113
Uh, borrowing money hugely to
do so, all to make a profit.
387
00:20:41,143 --> 00:20:46,253
So what you've got is, uh, a increasingly
difficult position on the productive level
388
00:20:46,253 --> 00:20:48,203
in the economy itself and profitability.
389
00:20:48,453 --> 00:20:51,143
But in the financial
sector, it was euphoria.
390
00:20:51,343 --> 00:20:52,953
Everybody's pumping money in.
391
00:20:53,243 --> 00:20:56,823
Uh, it's a bit like now, uh, to
some extent, and they're pumping
392
00:20:56,823 --> 00:21:00,203
in, uh, huge amounts of money
in order to make more money.
393
00:21:00,213 --> 00:21:01,433
It's money out of money.
394
00:21:01,583 --> 00:21:03,263
It doesn't matter about any production.
395
00:21:03,263 --> 00:21:05,783
That's, that's what stock
market investors are like.
396
00:21:06,073 --> 00:21:11,343
But of course, uh, just like, um,
you can't, you can't do that if the
397
00:21:11,343 --> 00:21:15,423
foundations upon which your economy's
beses- based are beginning to crumble.
398
00:21:15,653 --> 00:21:18,283
And at a certain point,
it came to a collapse.
399
00:21:18,583 --> 00:21:21,163
I would point out that all the
economists of the time, the mainstream
400
00:21:21,163 --> 00:21:22,553
economists, thought it wouldn't collapse.
401
00:21:22,583 --> 00:21:27,903
They all thought it was fine, uh, and,
uh, made rather unfortunate statements
402
00:21:28,083 --> 00:21:30,843
that, for them, later on when it
became clear everything was absolutely
403
00:21:30,853 --> 00:21:32,133
fine, then we had the collapse.
404
00:21:32,343 --> 00:21:37,627
And of course, we had the 1929 stock
market crash Investors jumping out of
405
00:21:37,627 --> 00:21:42,637
windows because they've lost all their
money, and we had a huge, great crash.
406
00:21:42,987 --> 00:21:47,847
That, that crash then led on to a
period of not re- of depression.
407
00:21:48,347 --> 00:21:50,127
There, there was no
recovery from that slump.
408
00:21:50,497 --> 00:21:55,287
It was throughout the 1930s, masses
of unemployed people in queues, as
409
00:21:55,297 --> 00:21:59,097
you see in the pictures in the United
States and, and in Europe as well.
410
00:21:59,547 --> 00:22:05,877
And just sit- and out in the country,
and for the farmers wiped out, uh, with,
411
00:22:06,017 --> 00:22:09,037
with their crops gone and the Dust Bowl.
412
00:22:09,337 --> 00:22:12,717
And Grapes of Wrath is a novel
written by Steinbeck which
413
00:22:12,717 --> 00:22:14,377
describes the situation there.
414
00:22:14,667 --> 00:22:18,767
This was a horrendously depressed
period for the United States, but
415
00:22:18,767 --> 00:22:22,327
not just the United States, for
the other major economies at will.
416
00:22:22,647 --> 00:22:26,697
And they only came out of that when
the government intervened in the
417
00:22:26,697 --> 00:22:31,857
latter part of the 1930s, basically
to, to build a war economy, and
418
00:22:31,867 --> 00:22:35,657
that's the, the situation that took
place in that particular depression.
419
00:22:36,027 --> 00:22:40,027
But it, again, the fundamental point
was it was profitability started
420
00:22:40,027 --> 00:22:44,447
to downturn, and w- in the book, I
show you, give the figures for this.
421
00:22:44,447 --> 00:22:49,377
And I s- emphasize that because,
um, this book has got a lot of facts
422
00:22:49,377 --> 00:22:54,007
and figures in it, because I wanted
to convince people with facts and
423
00:22:54,007 --> 00:22:56,077
figures that the theory is correct.
424
00:22:56,347 --> 00:23:00,497
Because this theory of the tendency of
the rate of profit to fall that Marx
425
00:23:00,497 --> 00:23:06,287
expresses in volume three of Capital
has been disputed not just by mainstream
426
00:23:06,287 --> 00:23:09,987
economists who ignore it all together,
but, well, lots of people on the left.
427
00:23:10,307 --> 00:23:13,597
Socialists who consider themselves
socialists, they dispute this theory.
428
00:23:13,677 --> 00:23:14,787
They don't think it's correct.
429
00:23:15,167 --> 00:23:19,657
Uh, even Marxists dis- dispute the theory,
and have come up with alternatives.
430
00:23:19,667 --> 00:23:24,127
So I wanted to show that this was
correct, and that this theory can
431
00:23:24,127 --> 00:23:25,257
be backed up with the evidence.
432
00:23:26,177 --> 00:23:29,367
Marshall: Yeah, and, and just, just if
you can just explain to me, Michael,
433
00:23:29,377 --> 00:23:31,447
wh- where does the, the variance lie?
434
00:23:31,457 --> 00:23:35,837
Like in other words, d- don't the, the,
the rate of profit, you know, i- isn't
435
00:23:35,837 --> 00:23:39,537
there, is there an objective measure in
terms of numbers, in terms of earnings?
436
00:23:39,537 --> 00:23:43,737
Like, so where, where is, where do you
think that this⦠I- is it about the why?
437
00:23:44,247 --> 00:23:46,367
Well, like, where, where do you
think, where did, did this, uh,
438
00:23:46,407 --> 00:23:47,477
these disagreements come from?
439
00:23:47,477 --> 00:23:50,167
And if you can just give one or two
of the other perspectives- Yes ⦠uh,
440
00:23:50,237 --> 00:23:53,077
during that time that, that, that
really, that take a different view.
441
00:23:53,077 --> 00:23:56,317
I wanna, I wanna just try to
understand why, what their, their,
442
00:23:56,337 --> 00:23:57,367
their argument is, essentially.
443
00:23:57,367 --> 00:23:57,397
Yeah.
444
00:23:57,397 --> 00:23:58,377
How would they dispute it?
445
00:23:58,677 --> 00:24:03,597
Michael: Well, the fir- I think the
biggest one amongst the left, uhâ¦
446
00:24:03,647 --> 00:24:06,777
Well, first of all, let's say the
biggest one amongst the mainstream was
447
00:24:07,107 --> 00:24:08,957
that this was a series of accidents.
448
00:24:08,967 --> 00:24:08,997
Uh-huh.
449
00:24:09,187 --> 00:24:10,717
Bad policy decisions.
450
00:24:10,997 --> 00:24:13,397
People, uh, governments
make wrong decisions.
451
00:24:13,397 --> 00:24:19,399
They put the interest rates up, the
bank too high, or they, uh- Introduced
452
00:24:19,409 --> 00:24:21,799
tariffs and blocked, uh, trade to go on.
453
00:24:22,089 --> 00:24:24,699
So they would say it was
political decisions made by the
454
00:24:24,699 --> 00:24:26,739
leaders which caused the slump.
455
00:24:27,109 --> 00:24:28,819
And so what do we learn from that?
456
00:24:28,949 --> 00:24:32,199
If that was correct, then all we
have to do is get the right decisions
457
00:24:32,209 --> 00:24:34,939
from the right political leaders,
and we won't have any more slumps.
458
00:24:35,129 --> 00:24:37,789
Although I have to say, since
the 1930s, we've had a few.
459
00:24:38,079 --> 00:24:40,849
So m- there's an awful lot, lot
of political leaders who are
460
00:24:40,879 --> 00:24:42,619
still wrong, if that's the theory.
461
00:24:42,919 --> 00:24:45,449
Then there's⦠amongst the
leftists, there's a different theory.
462
00:24:45,759 --> 00:24:50,809
Uh, first of all, there's financial,
uh, irregularity, a l- lack of, uh,
463
00:24:50,839 --> 00:24:52,499
control over the financial sector.
464
00:24:52,509 --> 00:24:55,829
It's out of control, and that ⦠It
brings everything else down.
465
00:24:56,119 --> 00:24:59,279
Um, I mean, there's a certain
element of truth in that argument,
466
00:24:59,539 --> 00:25:02,709
but the question you have to ask
is, why did it get out of control?
467
00:25:02,759 --> 00:25:03,859
What's, what's driving it?
468
00:25:04,129 --> 00:25:09,099
And also, uh, sometimes if you reduce
the financial sector, if the economy in
469
00:25:09,099 --> 00:25:11,549
general is doing okay, there is no crisis.
470
00:25:11,549 --> 00:25:15,499
It just ⦠You know, a few banks
go to the wall or a company that's
471
00:25:15,739 --> 00:25:19,939
got out of control falls away, but
not when the whole thing melts down.
472
00:25:20,189 --> 00:25:23,939
So there's something going on
beneath in the real economy which
473
00:25:23,959 --> 00:25:25,439
must have caused that situation.
474
00:25:25,439 --> 00:25:31,793
So financial, um- Uh, lack of control,
regulation, uh, is another theory
475
00:25:31,793 --> 00:25:33,543
which I don't think is, is convincing.
476
00:25:33,883 --> 00:25:37,083
The other main leftist theories,
and these are probably a bit more,
477
00:25:37,363 --> 00:25:40,233
is that, and it's often argued, and
particularly among socialists in the
478
00:25:40,233 --> 00:25:46,473
past, is that, uh, workers get wages
and they'd only get ⦠They don't
479
00:25:46,483 --> 00:25:49,793
have enough wages to buy all the goods
that the capitalists are producing.
480
00:25:49,833 --> 00:25:53,173
The capitalists are producing
way more than wages can buy.
481
00:25:53,173 --> 00:25:54,093
So there's underconsumption.
482
00:25:54,703 --> 00:25:58,383
There's a lack of consumption, lack
of demand, so the capitalists find
483
00:25:58,383 --> 00:26:01,773
themselves unable to sell their goods
because workers don't have enough money.
484
00:26:01,813 --> 00:26:05,293
Well, uh, Engels answered this,
uh, back in the 19th century.
485
00:26:05,293 --> 00:26:06,983
He said, "That's always the case.
486
00:26:07,403 --> 00:26:10,393
Workers never have enough money to
buy all the goods the capitalists
487
00:26:10,393 --> 00:26:14,113
are, are producing." So that doesn't
explain booms and slumps at all.
488
00:26:14,113 --> 00:26:17,383
It just explains that workers don't
have control over their economy.
489
00:26:17,733 --> 00:26:20,713
Uh, that they're not in a position
to decide what the capitalists do.
490
00:26:21,143 --> 00:26:23,543
So where do the capitalists
get their profit if they d- if
491
00:26:23,543 --> 00:26:25,963
there's not enough wages earned by
492
00:26:26,143 --> 00:26:27,533
They get it from other capitalists.
493
00:26:27,953 --> 00:26:30,733
Most capitalists sell
goods to other capitalists.
494
00:26:31,063 --> 00:26:34,893
Uh, if you're sitting in this
room now, your headphones are on.
495
00:26:35,153 --> 00:26:36,963
Who made the ca- who made the headphones?
496
00:26:36,963 --> 00:26:38,973
Or who made the bits of
metal in the headphones?
497
00:26:38,973 --> 00:26:40,003
Who made the wires?
498
00:26:40,273 --> 00:26:42,533
Who made the, uh, sound system?
499
00:26:42,773 --> 00:26:45,363
All these are different capitalists, and
they're selling to other capitalists.
500
00:26:45,363 --> 00:26:49,253
They're selling to Zoom
or r- studios and so on.
501
00:26:49,563 --> 00:26:55,573
And then finally, maybe, uh, Marshall
has to pay some money, uh, uh, out of
502
00:26:55,573 --> 00:27:00,473
his wages to get the ⦠He said, "But
the vast majority of the activity going
503
00:27:00,473 --> 00:27:04,663
on, and sales going on, is between
capitalists." So the system works.
504
00:27:04,673 --> 00:27:08,723
It doesn't need workers
to have, uh, enough wages.
505
00:27:08,953 --> 00:27:11,843
It just needs capitalists to be
able to make profit out of each
506
00:27:11,843 --> 00:27:13,653
other and workers in general.
507
00:27:13,923 --> 00:27:14,843
So that's the second.
508
00:27:15,053 --> 00:27:18,453
The final one, I suppose, is
that there's al- capitalists are
509
00:27:18,453 --> 00:27:20,053
always producing far too much.
510
00:27:20,093 --> 00:27:23,583
The ⦠It's a bit similar to the other
argument, but they ⦠It's nonstop.
511
00:27:23,593 --> 00:27:24,703
They, they, they're blind.
512
00:27:25,053 --> 00:27:28,013
Uh, they just keep producing, keep
producing, and then suddenly they go
513
00:27:28,023 --> 00:27:32,589
over a cliff, uh, and it all collapses
down Uh, so there's overproduction.
514
00:27:32,599 --> 00:27:34,709
So this is a theory of overproduction.
515
00:27:35,069 --> 00:27:38,309
My reply to that is, yes,
that's exactly what a slump is.
516
00:27:38,439 --> 00:27:40,919
There's overproduction, they
can't sell all their goods,
517
00:27:41,049 --> 00:27:42,239
they've gone down a cliff.
518
00:27:42,439 --> 00:27:45,999
But why was it going fine and
then they go down a cliff?
519
00:27:46,359 --> 00:27:48,709
What's ⦠Why has that suddenly happened?
520
00:27:49,129 --> 00:27:51,689
Uh, why doesn't it happen all
the time then, if that's the- Mm
521
00:27:51,689 --> 00:27:52,439
if that's the argument?
522
00:27:52,719 --> 00:27:57,339
And that argument, again, I don't think,
doesn't give you a convincing explanation
523
00:27:57,659 --> 00:27:59,529
of this process of booms and slumps.
524
00:27:59,529 --> 00:28:01,649
It doesn't explain booms and slumps.
525
00:28:01,649 --> 00:28:04,759
It doesn't explain booms in that case,
or it doesn't explain slumps that
526
00:28:04,759 --> 00:28:06,609
come afterward, and then booms again.
527
00:28:06,959 --> 00:28:11,409
Uh, we need a ⦠The, the theory must go
back to what Marx said was the key factor
528
00:28:11,429 --> 00:28:16,699
about capitalism, that capitalists only
produce and invest if they make a profit.
529
00:28:17,129 --> 00:28:19,549
So it's- Mm ⦠profit that's
gonna belie behind everything.
530
00:28:19,589 --> 00:28:22,159
Profit lies behind everything,
doesn't it, in our society?
531
00:28:22,509 --> 00:28:23,519
Everything is profit.
532
00:28:23,759 --> 00:28:27,079
I mean, uh, uh, you wouldn't believe
this, Marshall, but if you read
533
00:28:27,079 --> 00:28:30,059
the mainstream economists, there's
no ⦠All their theories of economics
534
00:28:30,059 --> 00:28:31,429
have no profit in them at all.
535
00:28:31,489 --> 00:28:32,219
There's no profit.
536
00:28:32,829 --> 00:28:37,339
Um, uh, the theories of neoclassical
economics don't refer to profit at all.
537
00:28:37,349 --> 00:28:40,869
They refer to factors of production
and returns on factors, but
538
00:28:40,979 --> 00:28:41,999
they don't refer to profit.
539
00:28:42,419 --> 00:28:47,289
The ⦠Some Marxists also don't ⦠They
say profits has massively increased,
540
00:28:47,719 --> 00:28:51,649
so- Mm ⦠uh, so therefore they can't
be profit that causes, uh, the crisis.
541
00:28:51,649 --> 00:28:54,669
That's another argument
for ⦠coming from, from Marxists.
542
00:28:54,979 --> 00:28:55,239
Well,
543
00:28:55,639 --> 00:28:55,769
Marshall: uh,
544
00:28:55,949 --> 00:28:56,049
Michael: it-
545
00:28:56,049 --> 00:28:56,069
Marshall: Yeah.
546
00:28:56,069 --> 00:28:59,309
And I think you use the terms
exogenous factors in the book, too,
547
00:28:59,309 --> 00:29:02,479
as well- Yes ⦠of how they kind of
separate these, these influences into
548
00:29:02,539 --> 00:29:04,009
Michael: different things They're
nothing to do with capitalism.
549
00:29:04,009 --> 00:29:05,619
See, capitalism's a great system.
550
00:29:05,919 --> 00:29:11,089
It's just that either there's some bad,
bad decisions, bad people, bad regulation.
551
00:29:11,489 --> 00:29:12,929
It's ⦠Or it's the finance.
552
00:29:13,129 --> 00:29:18,479
Everything's fine down in the world of,
uh, tech, down in the world of industry.
553
00:29:18,829 --> 00:29:21,349
Uh, that's all going
perfectly fine under profit.
554
00:29:21,619 --> 00:29:24,139
What's going wrong is that there's
a, sort of, lot of financial
555
00:29:24,139 --> 00:29:28,009
speculation going on with hedge funds
and, and we need to control them.
556
00:29:28,309 --> 00:29:31,049
But they're only speculating
because they know they can make
557
00:29:31,049 --> 00:29:33,889
money out of the others, and they
have to make money to do that.
558
00:29:33,899 --> 00:29:36,239
So it, it ⦠You can't separate the two